IBTG vs SHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
IBTG's duration was 0.2 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SHV's 0.3 on May 31, 2026; IBTG charges 0.07% to SHV's 0.15%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.9bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF and $23.5bn for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.
IBTG costs 0.08 points a year less; both returned +3.6% over a year; SHV is 12.6 times larger.
| IBTG | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $1.9bn | $23.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index | ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
IBTG and SHV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index and SHV follows ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index.
- Number of holdings. IBTG holds 10 positions and SHV holds 67.
- Size. IBTG has $1.9bn in net assets and SHV $23.5bn (Net assets); SHV is 12.4 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
IBTG and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IBTG
IBTG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
About SHV
SHV tracks an index of 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IBTG or SHV?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBTG returned +3.6% and SHV +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IBTG or SHV?
- IBTG is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBTG against SHV, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-shv
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IBTG against SHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-shv
[IBTG against SHV (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibtg-vs-shv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.