Which returned more over the last year, IBDX or SUSC?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBDX returned −1.0% and SUSC −2.1%.

Which is cheaper, IBDX or SUSC?

IBDX is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

IBDX vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees

IBDX's duration was 5.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and SUSC's 6.7 on May 31, 2026; IBDX charges 0.10% to SUSC's 0.18%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.8bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF and $1.3bn for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF.

IBDX costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; IBDX is 1.4 times larger.

IBDX vs SUSC: Differences, Returns & Fees
	IBDX	SUSC
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.18%
Net assets	$1.8bn	$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year	−1.0%	−2.1%
What it tracks	Bloomberg December 2032 Maturity Corporate Index	Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index
Holdings in common	4%
Below its high	3.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026	4.5%, high on Aug 3, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

−1.0%

IBDX total return, 1 year

−2.1%

SUSC total return, 1 year

0.10%

IBDX expense ratio

0.18%

SUSC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBDX and SUSC hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding IBDX SUSC

Pentair Finance SARL, due Jul 15, 2032 0.13% 0.12%

Coca-Cola Co. (The), due Jan 5, 2032 0.54% 0.12%

Zoetis, Inc., due Nov 16, 2032 0.25% 0.09%

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc., due Mar 25, 2032 0.13% 0.08%

AerCap Ireland Capital DAC, due Jan 30, 2032 1.14% 0.07%

Diageo Capital plc, due Apr 29, 2032 0.20% 0.07%

Williams Cos., Inc. (The), due Aug 15, 2032 0.33% 0.07%

Clorox Co. (The), due May 1, 2032 0.19% 0.07%

Morgan Stanley, due Apr 1, 2032 0.33% 0.07%

Synopsys, Inc., due Apr 1, 2032 0.46% 0.06%

Weyerhaeuser Co., due Mar 15, 2032 0.22% 0.06%

FactSet Research Systems, Inc., due Mar 1, 2032 0.14% 0.06%

Only in IBDX

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Nov 15, 2032 1.20%

Oracle Corp., due Sep 26, 2032 0.85%

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Aug 15, 2032 0.85%

Amazon.com, Inc., due Apr 13, 2032 0.71%

AT&T, Inc., due Feb 1, 2032 0.66%

Haleon US Capital LLC, due Mar 24, 2032 0.57%

BP Capital Markets America, Inc., due Jan 12, 2032 0.56%

Rogers Communications, Inc., due Mar 15, 2032 0.56%

Only in SUSC

Salesforce Inc, due Apr 11, 2028 0.35%

Avangrid Inc, due Jun 1, 2029 0.34%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due May 15, 2028 0.34%

National Bank of Canada, due Dec 18, 2028 0.30%

Automatic Data Processing Inc, due Sep 1, 2030 0.27%

NextEra Energy Capital Holdings Inc, due Nov 1, 2029 0.24%

Cheniere Energy Inc, due Oct 15, 2028 0.24%

Digital Realty Trust LP, due Jul 15, 2028 0.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IBDX

iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF

SUSC

iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year −1.0% −2.1%

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.18%

Holdings 434 3958

Net assets $1.8bn $1.3bn

IBDX and SUSC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IBDX

IBDX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About SUSC

SUSC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Aug 3, 2021 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBDX or SUSC?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBDX returned −1.0% and SUSC −2.1%.
Which is cheaper, IBDX or SUSC?: IBDX is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IBDX vs VCEB IBDX vs QLTA IBDX vs IBDY IBDX vs IGEB SUSC vs VCIT SUSC vs VTC SUSC vs VCEB QLTA vs SUSC

IBDX on its own →SUSC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

IBDX and SUSC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBDX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IBDX ↗SUSC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for SUSC ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBDX against SUSC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdx-vs-susc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.