Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IBB vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to XLC's −10.4%, and XLC charges 0.08% to IBB's 0.44%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBB and XLC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $22.1bn for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+37.5%
IBB total return, 1 year
−10.4%
XLC total return, 1 year
0.44%
IBB expense ratio
0.08%
XLC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLC costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 47.9 points; XLC is 2.0 times larger.

IBB vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBBXLC
Return
Total return, 1 year+37.5%−10.4%
Drawdown
Below its high13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBiotechCommunication Services Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.44%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.0bn$22.1bn
Active share vs the S&P 50099%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50%75.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBB XLC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IBB
GILEAD SCIENCES 8.56%
AMGEN INC 8.20%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS 7.53%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS 5.64%
MODERNA 5.29%
NATERA 3.85%
ARGENX SE ADR 3.42%
ILLUMINA INC 2.93%
Only in XLC
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 21.45%
ALPHABET INC CL A 12.27%
ALPHABET INC CL C 9.82%
WALT DISNEY CO 5.33%
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE 4.80%
COMCAST CORP CLASS A 4.48%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 4.45%
APPLOVIN CORP CLASS A 4.34%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IBB iShares Biotechnology ETF XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Biotech Tracks an index of Communication services
Total return, 1 year +37.5% −10.4%
Expense ratio 0.44% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 40.2% 99.8%
Holdings 245 23
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.0bn $22.1bn

IBB and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IBB and XLC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IBB

By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.

XLC

XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IBB and XLC in the same category?
IBB is a thematic ETF and XLC is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IBB or XLC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and XLC −10.4%.
Which is cheaper, IBB or XLC?
XLC is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 40% of IBB and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBB against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-xlc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.