Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IBB vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to MAGS's +5.8%, and MAGS charges 0.30% to IBB's 0.44%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBB and MAGS

Net assets: $11.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Biotechnology ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+37.5%
IBB total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.44%
IBB expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.7 points; IBB is 2.0 times larger.

IBB vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBBMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+37.5%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBiotechNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.44%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.0bn$5.5bn
Active share vs the S&P 50099%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBB MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IBB
GILEAD SCIENCES 8.56%
AMGEN INC 8.20%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS 7.53%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS 5.64%
MODERNA 5.29%
NATERA 3.85%
ARGENX SE ADR 3.42%
ILLUMINA INC 2.93%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IBB iShares Biotechnology ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Biotech Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +37.5% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.44% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 40.2% 22.5%
Holdings 245 8
Net assets, IBB as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $11.0bn $5.5bn

IBB and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IBB and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IBB

By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IBB and MAGS in the same category?
IBB is a thematic ETF and MAGS is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, IBB or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, IBB or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 40% of IBB and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBB against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.