Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
HOLA vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HOLA returned +10.7% to TLT's −4.8%, and TLT charges 0.15% to HOLA's 0.50%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HOLA and TLTNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $282m for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF and $48.3bn for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.5 points; TLT is far larger, $48.3bn against $282m.
| Measure | HOLA | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.7% | −4.8% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +10.2% | |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not published | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 6.5 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $282m | $48.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.69 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.46: about 0.46% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.40% | |
| Down-week capture | 36.9% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
HOLA and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HOLA
HOLA is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.46, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.46% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks HOLA fell 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of 36.9%. Over the same 52 weeks HOLA returned +10.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.5 percentage points ahead of cash.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are HOLA and TLT in the same category?
- HOLA is an alternatives ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, HOLA or TLT?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HOLA returned +10.7% and TLT −4.8%.
- Which is cheaper, HOLA or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HOLA against TLT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hola-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). HOLA against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hola-vs-tlt
[HOLA against TLT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hola-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.