Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GLD vs HOLA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GLD returned +2.8% to HOLA's +10.7%, and GLD charges 0.40% to HOLA's 0.50%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLD and HOLA

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $131.3bn for SPDR Gold Shares and $282m for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF.

At a glance
+2.8%
GLD total return, 1 year
+10.7%
HOLA total return, 1 year
0.40%
GLD expense ratio
0.50%
HOLA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; GLD is far larger, $131.3bn against $282m.

GLD vs HOLA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGLDHOLA
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.8%+10.7%
Total return, 52 weeks+10.2%
Drawdown
Below its high24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGoldnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash6.5 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.50%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$131.3bn$282m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.69
Beta to the S&P 500+0.46: about 0.46% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.40%
Down-week capture36.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

GLD SPDR Gold Shares HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Holds gold Hedged equity
Total return, 1 year +2.8% +10.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +2.9% (IAU) +16.9% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs IAU −6.2 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.50%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $131.3bn $282m

GLD and HOLA on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

GLD and HOLA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

HOLA

HOLA is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.46, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.46% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks HOLA fell 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of 36.9%. Over the same 52 weeks HOLA returned +10.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.5 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are GLD and HOLA in the same category?
GLD is a commodity ETF and HOLA is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, GLD or HOLA?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +2.8% and HOLA +10.7%.
Which is cheaper, GLD or HOLA?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLD against HOLA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gld-vs-hola

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.