Data as of Oct 27, 2026.

vs
Share
askIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs TOAK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, TLT returned −6.9% to TOAK's +3.6%, and TLT charges 0.15% to TOAK's 0.26%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and TOAK

Net assets: $47.8bn on Oct 26, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $90m on May 31, 2026 for Manager Directed Portfolios Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF.

At a glance
−6.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+3.6%
TOAK total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.26%
TOAK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points.

TLT vs TOAK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTTOAK
Return
Total return, 1 year−6.9%+3.6%
Total return, 52 weeks+3.6%
Drawdown
Below its high42.1%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash0.1 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.26%
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 26, 2026 and TOAK as of May 31, 2026$47.8bn$90m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.17
Beta to the S&P 500+0.04: about 0.04% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.02%
Down-week capture1.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell25 of 52, by 1.10% on average

Method

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF TOAK Manager Directed Portfolios Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
Issuer iShares Manager Directed Portfolios
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Hedged equity
Total return, 1 year −6.9% +3.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −6.7% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.26%
Holdings 47 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 26, 2026 and TOAK as of May 31, 2026 $47.8bn $90m

TLT and TOAK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 27, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 27, 2026 it returned −6.9% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.1% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 27, 2026.

TOAK

TOAK is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 27, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.17 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.04, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.04% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 25 of those 52 weeks, by 1.10% on average. In the same weeks TOAK fell 0.02% on average, a down-week capture of 1.9%. Over the same 52 weeks TOAK returned +3.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 0.1 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Are TLT and TOAK in the same category?
TLT is a bond ETF and TOAK is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, TLT or TOAK?
In the year to Oct 27, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.9% and TOAK +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or TOAK?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against TOAK, data as of Oct 27, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-toak

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.