Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to IWO's +7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and IWO

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $14.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.24%
IWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWO costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 39.0 points; IWO is 2.8 times larger.

HGER vs IWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERIWO
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexRussell 2000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER IWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +8.0% (VTWG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs VTWG
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 0 1122
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWO as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $14.0bn

HGER and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and IWO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or IWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and IWO +7.9%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or IWO?
IWO is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against IWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.