Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to IWF's +0.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and IWF

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $124.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+0.9%
IWF total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.18%
IWF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWF costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 46.0 points; IWF is far larger, $124.7bn against $5.0bn.

HGER vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERIWF
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+0.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$124.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER IWF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in IWF
NVIDIA 15.30%
APPLE 8.18%
MICROSOFT 5.94%
ALPHABET CLASS A 5.62%
BROADCOM INC 4.79%
ALPHABET CLASS C 4.53%
TESLA INC 3.58%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +0.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +1.1% (VONG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VONG
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 93.5%
Holdings 0 374
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $124.7bn

HGER and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and IWF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or IWF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and IWF +0.9%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or IWF?
IWF is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-iwf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.