Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

HGER vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, HGER returned +46.9% to MOAT's +10.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HGER and MOAT

Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
+46.9%
HGER total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.68%
HGER expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MOAT costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.6 points; MOAT is 2.3 times larger.

HGER vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureHGERMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year+46.9%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksQuantix Commodity IndexMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.0bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HGER MOAT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HGER
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Harbor VanEck
What it is Tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year +46.9% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 91.6%
Holdings 0 54
Net assets, HGER as of Oct 28, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.0bn $11.6bn

HGER and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

HGER and MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HGER

HGER tracks an index of Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +46.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 0 positions, with the top ten at not published.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +46.9% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, HGER or MOAT?
MOAT is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HGER against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.