Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GSWO vs RLY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GSWO returned +17.2% to RLY's +23.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GSWO and RLY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.8bn for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF and $1.4bn for State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF.

At a glance
+17.2%
GSWO total return, 1 year
+23.5%
RLY total return, 1 year
0.15%
GSWO expense ratio
0.50%
RLY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GSWO costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; GSWO is 1.3 times larger.

GSWO vs RLY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGSWORLY
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+23.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.8%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.50%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.8bn$1.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.4%99.7%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GSWO and RLY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GSWO RLY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GSWO
NVIDIA CORP 5.79%
APPLE INC 5.06%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.02%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.75%
ALPHABET INC 2.19%
ALPHABET INC 1.89%
BROADCOM INC 1.88%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.38%
Only in RLY
STATE STREET SPDR S+P GLOBAL N 28.13%
STATE STREET SPDR BLOOMBERG EN 23.96%
STATE STREET SPDR S+P GLOBAL I 22.57%
STATE STREET SPDR BLOOMBERG 1 6.50%
STATE STREET ENERGY SELECT SEC 5.21%
STATE STREET SPDR DOW JONES RE 3.70%
VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF 2.95%
STATE STREET SPDR FTSE INTERNA 2.94%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +17.2% +23.5%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 66.1% 0.0%
Holdings 739 11
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $1.8bn $1.4bn

GSWO and RLY on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RLY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GSWO

GSWO tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 739 positions, with the top ten at 27.4%.

RLY

RLY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 11 positions, with the top ten at 99.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GSWO or RLY?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GSWO returned +17.2% and RLY +23.5%.
Which is cheaper, GSWO or RLY?
GSWO is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GSWO and RLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 66% of GSWO and 0% of RLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GSWO against RLY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gswo-vs-rly

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.