Which returned more over the last year, RLY or SFGV?

In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RLY returned +23.5% and SFGV +22.4%.

Which is cheaper, RLY or SFGV?

SFGV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do RLY and SFGV overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of RLY and 48% of SFGV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Across categories

RLY vs SFGV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RLY returned +23.5% to SFGV's +22.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RLY and SFGV

Net assets: $1.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF, and $1.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Sequoia Global Value ETF.

RLY on its own →SFGV on its own →

At a glance

+23.5%

RLY total return, 1 year

+22.4%

SFGV total return, 1 year

0.50%

RLY expense ratio

0.33%

SFGV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SFGV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points.

RLY vs SFGV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	RLY	SFGV
Return
Measure	RLY	SFGV
Total return, 1 year	+23.5%	+22.4%
Drawdown
Measure	RLY	SFGV
Below its high	3.8%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	RLY	SFGV
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Measure	RLY	SFGV
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.33%
Net assets, RLY as of Nov 3, 2026 and SFGV as of Aug 31, 2026	$1.4bn	$1.2bn
Holdings
Measure	RLY	SFGV
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	99.7%	46.0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, RLY and SFGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RLY SFGV

Only in one fund ↓

Only in RLY

STATE STREET SPDR S+P GLOBAL N 28.13%

STATE STREET SPDR BLOOMBERG EN 23.96%

STATE STREET SPDR S+P GLOBAL I 22.57%

STATE STREET SPDR BLOOMBERG 1 6.50%

STATE STREET ENERGY SELECT SEC 5.21%

STATE STREET SPDR DOW JONES RE 3.70%

VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF 2.95%

STATE STREET SPDR FTSE INTERNA 2.94%

Only in SFGV

VANGUARD FTSE DEVELOPED ETF 10.04%

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF 10.01%

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF 6.01%

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF 5.24%

Avantis Real Estate ETF 4.85%

Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF 4.07%

Apple Inc 1.84%

Johnson & Johnson 1.42%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street Sequoia Financial

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +23.5% +22.4%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.33%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 47.9%

Holdings 11 523

Net assets, RLY as of Nov 3, 2026 and SFGV as of Aug 31, 2026 $1.4bn $1.2bn

RLY and SFGV on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

RLY

RLY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +23.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 11 positions, with the top ten at 99.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

SFGV

SFGV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +22.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 523 positions, with the top ten at 46.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RLY or SFGV?: In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RLY returned +23.5% and SFGV +22.4%.
Which is cheaper, RLY or SFGV?: SFGV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RLY and SFGV overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of RLY and 48% of SFGV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

GSWO vs RLY CGDG vs RLY GSWO vs SFGV CGDG vs SFGV

Where to next

RLY on its own →SFGV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →RLY dividend history →RLY holdings →SFGV dividend history →SFGV holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

RLY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

RLY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

SFGV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SFGV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sequoia Financial website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RLY against SFGV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rly-vs-sfgv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.