CGDG vs GSWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDG and GSWO hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and GSWO returned +17.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $5.7bn for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF and $1.8bn for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF.
GSWO costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points; CGDG is 3.2 times larger.
| CGDG | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $5.7bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.2% | +17.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity Index |
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.0% | 28.7% |
| Below its high | 4.0%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDG and GSWO hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
15% in common
On the same fields
CGDG and GSWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDG in plain words
CGDG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 47% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 26.0%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
GSWO in plain words
GSWO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 68% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 756 positions, with the top ten at 28.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDG or GSWO?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDG returned +10.2% and GSWO +17.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDG or GSWO?
- GSWO is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDG against GSWO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdg-vs-gswo
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGDG against GSWO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdg-vs-gswo
[CGDG against GSWO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdg-vs-gswo)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.