Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
GRNY vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRNY returned +6.5% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GRNY and PULS
Net assets: $4.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points.
| Measure | GRNY | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +4.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, GRNY as of Jul 31, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 | $4.3bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 98% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 26.5% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
GRNY and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
GRNY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +6.5% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, GRNY or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.60 percentage points a year. That is about $60 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GRNY against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). GRNY against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-puls
[GRNY against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/grny-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.