Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PULS vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to SPMO's +18.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PULS and SPMO

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $22.3bn for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

At a glance
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
+18.4%
SPMO total return, 1 year
0.15%
PULS expense ratio
0.13%
SPMO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPMO costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.4 points; SPMO is 1.1 times larger.

PULS vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSSPMO
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Momentum Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.8bn$22.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund50.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 444 weekly returns
PULS SPMO
Return
Total return edge SPMO +32.2% +323.1%
Annualized edge SPMO +3.3% +18.4%
Price return edge SPMO −0.9% +283.1%
Risk
Volatility edge PULS 1.9% 20.5%
Max drawdown edge PULS −5.9% −28.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPMO 0.27 0.79
Sortino edge SPMO 0.32 1.19
Calmar edge SPMO 0.57 0.65
Reading

SPMO returned more: +323.1% to +32.2%. PULS swung less: 1.9% to 20.5%. PULS fell less at its worst: −5.9% to −28.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PULS vs SPMO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePULSSPMOEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+32.2%+323.1%SPMOPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.3%+18.4%SPMOTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−0.9%+283.1%SPMOPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility1.9%20.5%PULSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation1.6%13.7%PULSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−5.9%−28.3%PULSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.79SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.321.19SPMOReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.570.65SPMOAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 444 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SPMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PULS SPMO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Only in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.95%
Micron Technology Inc 8.80%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.48%
Johnson & Johnson 4.86%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Intel Corp 4.60%
Alphabet Inc 3.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 3.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PGIM Invesco
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year +4.0% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.13%
Holdings 553 101
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.8bn $22.3bn

PULS and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 151 days apart.

Alert

PULS and SPMO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SPMO

SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 50.7%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SPMO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and SPMO +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SPMO?
SPMO is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PULS against SPMO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-spmo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.