Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or VHT?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and VHT +25.0%.

Which is cheaper, GLDM or VHT?

VHT is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GLDM vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GLDM is a commodity fund and VHT an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VHT returned +25.0% against +2.8%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GLDM and VHT

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

GLDM on its own →VHT on its own →

At a glance

+2.8%

GLDM total return, 1 year

+25.0%

VHT total return, 1 year

0.10%

GLDM expense ratio

0.09%

VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VHT costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.2 points; GLDM is 1.6 times larger.

GLDM vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GLDM	VHT
Return
Measure	GLDM	VHT
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+25.0%
Drawdown
Measure	GLDM	VHT
Below its high	24.5%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	GLDM	VHT
What it tracks	Gold	MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Measure	GLDM	VHT
Expense ratio	0.10%	0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026	$30.7bn	$19.1bn
Holdings
Measure	GLDM	VHT
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		51.8%

Method

Side by side

GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer State Street Vanguard

What it is Holds gold Tracks an index of Health Care

Total return, 1 year +2.8% +25.0%

Its benchmark over the same days +2.5% (GLD) +25.4% (FHLC)

Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs GLD −0.4 pts vs FHLC

Expense ratio 0.10% 0.09%

Holdings not counted 414

Net assets, GLDM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 $30.6bn $19.1bn

GLDM and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GLDM

Its expense ratio is 0.10% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLDM holds gold. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.5% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.5% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or VHT?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +2.8% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, GLDM or VHT?: VHT is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

GLDM vs XLV GLDM vs XLU GLDM vs XLI GLDM vs XRT IAU vs VHT USO vs VHT SLV vs VHT SIVR vs VHT

Where to next

GLDM on its own →VHT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →VHT dividend history →VHT holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

State Street website ↗

VHT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

VHT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Vanguard page for VHT ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GLDM against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gldm-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.