Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GDX vs GDXW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

GDX and GDXW are measured over different days, and GDX charges 0.51% to GDXW's 0.99%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDX and GDXW

Net assets: $25.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Gold Miners ETF, and $79m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF.

At a glance
+19.0%
GDX total return, 1 year
+10.3%
GDXW total return, since launch, Oct 30, 2025
0.51%
GDX expense ratio
0.99%
GDXW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GDX costs 0.48 points a year less; GDX is far larger, $25.6bn against $78m.

GDX vs GDXW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGDXGDXW
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.0%not published
Cash paid, share of starting value, since Oct 30, 202549.4%
Price change, since Oct 30, 2025fell 33.4%
Latest payout, annualized48.7%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Drawdown
Below its all-time high27.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersBenchmark: Gold miners, measured through GDX
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 5.6 pts
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 5.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.51%0.99%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.6bn$78m
Active share vs the S&P 500100%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 7, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026 · 50 weekly returns
GDX GDXW
Return
Total return edge GDX +11.3% +5.7%
Price return edge GDX +10.5% −35.5%
Risk
Max drawdown edge GDX −38.4% −46.2%
Reading

GDX returned more: +11.3% to +5.7%. GDX fell less at its worst: −38.4% to −46.2%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GDX vs GDXW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGDXGDXWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+11.3%+5.7%GDXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return+10.5%−35.5%GDXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown−38.4%−46.2%GDXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 50 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GDX and GDXW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GDX GDXW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GDX
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 11.45%
Newmont Corp 11.42%
Barrick Mining Corp 8.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.50%
Franco-Nevada Corp 5.33%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 4.78%
Gold Fields Ltd 3.96%
Kinross Gold Corp 3.88%
Only in GDXW
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Income ETF
What it is Gold miners option income, vs GDX
Total return, 1 year +19.0% +10.3% (since launch, Oct 30, 2025)
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) +16.0% (GDX) (since launch, Oct 30, 2025)
Gap to its benchmark +5.6 pts vs ACWI −5.7 pts vs GDX (since launch, Oct 30, 2025)
Expense ratio 0.51% 0.99%
Holdings 59 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, GDX as of Oct 27, 2026 and GDXW as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.6bn $79m

GDX and GDXW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for GDXW; the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

GDX and GDXW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GDX

By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

GDXW

Over the period from its first trade on Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 28, 2026, GDXW paid 49.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +16.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 48.7%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Are GDX and GDXW in the same category?
GDX is a thematic ETF and GDXW is an option-income ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, GDX or GDXW?
GDX is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDX against GDXW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdx-vs-gdxw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.