Which is cheaper, GDX or LYTE?

GDX is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

GDX vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

GDX and LYTE are compared on the fields both publish.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDX and LYTE

Net assets: $25.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Gold Miners ETF, and $165m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

GDX on its own →LYTE on its own →

At a glance

+19.0%

GDX total return, 1 year

−19.6%

LYTE total return, since launch, Aug 6, 2026

0.51%

GDX expense ratio

0.65%

LYTE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GDX costs 0.14 points a year less; GDX is far larger, $25.6bn against $163m.

GDX vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	GDX	LYTE
Return
Measure	GDX	LYTE
Total return, 1 year	+19.0%	not published
Drawdown
Measure	GDX	LYTE
Below its all-time high	27.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026	28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	GDX	LYTE
What it tracks	Gold miners	Photonics and optics
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 5.6 pts
Cost and size
Measure	GDX	LYTE
Expense ratio	0.51%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$25.6bn	$163m
Active share vs the S&P 500	100%
Holdings
Measure	GDX	LYTE
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight	12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	60%

Method

Side by side

GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

Where it sits Thematic ETF Thematic ETF

Issuer VanEck Roundhill

What it is Gold miners Photonics and optics

Total return, 1 year +19.0% −19.6% (since launch, Aug 6, 2026)

Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +5.6 pts vs ACWI not measured

Expense ratio 0.51% 0.65%

Holdings 59 not yet filed

Net assets, GDX as of Oct 27, 2026 and LYTE as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.6bn $165m

GDX and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

GDX

By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

LYTE

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GDX or LYTE?: GDX is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

GDX vs XBI GDX vs GDXY GDX vs GDXW GDX vs XOVR LYTE vs XBI AIRR vs LYTE LYTE vs REMX LYTE vs XLI

Where to next

GDX on its own →LYTE on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →GDX dividend history →GDX holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

GDX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GDX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

LYTE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

LYTE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for LYTE ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDX against LYTE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gdx-vs-lyte

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.