Which returned more over the last year, FV or XMHQ?

In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FV returned +20.0% and XMHQ +20.0%.

Which is cheaper, FV or XMHQ?

XMHQ is cheaper, by 0.64 percentage points a year. That is about $64 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do FV and XMHQ overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FV and 0% of XMHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Across categories

FV vs XMHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FV and XMHQ finished level, +20.0% against +20.0%, and they share 0% of their weight.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FV and XMHQ

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $3.8bn for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF and $5.8bn for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF.

FV on its own →XMHQ on its own →

At a glance

+20.0%

FV total return, 1 year

+20.0%

XMHQ total return, 1 year

0.89%

FV expense ratio

0.25%

XMHQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XMHQ costs 0.64 points a year less; both returned +20.0% over a year; XMHQ is 1.5 times larger.

FV vs XMHQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	FV	XMHQ
Return
Measure	FV	XMHQ
Total return, 1 year	+20.0%	+20.0%
Drawdown
Measure	FV	XMHQ
Below its high	4.1%, high on Oct 28, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	FV	XMHQ
What it tracks	Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index	S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index
Cost and size
Measure	FV	XMHQ
Expense ratio	0.89%	0.25%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$3.8bn	$5.8bn
Holdings
Measure	FV	XMHQ
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	99.9%	30.7%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, FV and XMHQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FV XMHQ

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FV

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF 22.02%

First Trust NYSE® Arca® Biotechnology Index Fund 21.16%

First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF 20.98%

First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® Fund 18.53%

First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund 17.19%

Only in XMHQ

TechnipFMC PLC 4.06%

Manhattan Associates Inc 3.92%

Exelixis Inc 3.88%

Medpace Holdings Inc 3.80%

United Therapeutics Corp 3.10%

nVent Electric PLC 2.60%

Carlisle Cos Inc 2.49%

Curtiss-Wright Corp 2.33%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer First Trust Invesco

What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +20.0% +20.0%

Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +5.2 pts vs VOO not measured

Expense ratio 0.89% 0.25%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 5 82

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $3.8bn $5.8bn

FV and XMHQ on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

FV tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.89% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 5 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 28, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

XMHQ

XMHQ tracks an index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 30.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FV or XMHQ?: In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FV returned +20.0% and XMHQ +20.0%.
Which is cheaper, FV or XMHQ?: XMHQ is cheaper, by 0.64 percentage points a year. That is about $64 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FV and XMHQ overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of FV and 0% of XMHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

FV vs JHMM FV vs XMMO FV vs VFLO FV vs SMMD IWR vs XMHQ IJH vs XMHQ IVOO vs XMHQ IMCG vs XMHQ

Where to next

FV on its own →XMHQ on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FV dividend history →FV holdings →XMHQ dividend history →XMHQ holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for FV ↗

XMHQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XMHQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for XMHQ ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FV against XMHQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fv-vs-xmhq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.