Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs FXL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to FXL's +29.0%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and FXL

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $2.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.60%
FXL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points.

FTEC vs FXL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECFXL
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+29.0%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexStrataQuant Technology Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.60%
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and FXL as of Oct 27, 2026$22.1bn$2.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC FXL
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +730.7%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +17.7%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +695.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FTEC (slight) 21.3% 22.5%
Max drawdown edge FTEC −34.1% −38.0%
Downside capture 100.0% 111.5%
Beta 1.00 1.13
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.94 0.75
Sortino edge FTEC 1.41 1.12
Treynor 0.199 0.122
Calmar edge FTEC 0.63 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +2.4% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.91
Information ratio −0.19 0.32
Tracking error 0.7% 11.8%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; FXL against IWB, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +730.7%. FTEC swung slightly less: 21.3% to 22.5%. FTEC fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −38.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs FXL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECFXLEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+730.7%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+17.7%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+695.4%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%22.5%FTEC (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%15.0%FTEC (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−38.0%FTECDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%137.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%111.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.13Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.76Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.75FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.12FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.122Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.47FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTIWBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+2.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.91Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−2.8% to +7.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.190.32Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%11.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and FXL hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC FXL
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 1.36%
Apple Inc 16.21% 1.24%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 1.50%
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 1.14%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 1.26%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 1.04%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07% 0.98%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 0.92%
Amphenol Corp 0.85% 1.10%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.83% 1.51%
Analog Devices Inc 0.78% 1.28%
Western Digital Corp 0.83% 0.75%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Intel Corp 1.65%
Oracle Corp 0.90%
Arista Networks Inc 0.84%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.82%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 0.42%
AppLovin Corp 0.41%
Only in FXL
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc 1.73%
Mobility Global Inc. 1.58%
KBR, Inc. 1.36%
Leidos Holdings, Inc. 1.36%
People Inc. 1.32%
Amdocs Limited 1.29%
Maplebear Inc. (Instacart) 1.24%
Science Applications International Corporation 1.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +29.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT +15.9 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 50.0%
Holdings 281 110
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and FXL as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $2.8bn

FTEC and FXL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1E01E6264D

FTEC and FXL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and FXL +29.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FXL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FXL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or FXL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and FXL +29.0%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or FXL?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and FXL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 50% of FXL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against FXL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-fxl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.