Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to VONG's +1.1%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and VONG

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.8 points.

FNDX vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$27.6bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX VONG
Return
Total return edge VONG +418.7% +620.2%
Annualized edge VONG +13.3% +16.1%
Price return edge VONG +298.9% +529.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 15.9% 18.3%
Max drawdown edge VONG (slight) −35.2% −32.5%
Downside capture 92.1% 99.8%
Beta 0.93 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG (slight) 0.74 0.80
Sortino edge VONG 1.05 1.20
Treynor 0.128 0.151
Calmar edge VONG 0.38 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.76
Information ratio −0.10 0.11
Tracking error 5.3% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VONG returned more: +620.2% to +418.7%. FNDX swung less: 15.9% to 18.3%. VONG fell slightly less at its worst: −32.5% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+620.2%VONGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+16.1%VONGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+529.4%VONGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%18.3%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%12.3%FNDX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−32.5%VONG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.901.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.80VONG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.20VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.50VONGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VONG hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX VONG
Apple Inc 4.46% 7.65%
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 5.59%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 5.88%
Alphabet Inc 1.41% 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21% 3.83%
Micron Technology Inc 0.97% 3.52%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 15.63%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80% 0.59%
Home Depot Inc 0.58% 0.62%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.56% 0.52%
Broadcom Inc 0.48% 4.79%
Caterpillar Inc 0.45% 1.08%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45%
Intel Corp 1.42%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Only in VONG
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.22%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.78%
Snowflake Inc 0.33%
Cloudflare Inc 0.33%
Datadog Inc 0.26%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.24%
Bloom Energy Corp 0.23%
Spotify Technology SA 0.23%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 95.5%
Holdings 731 373
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $27.6bn $47.1bn

FNDX and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5ADBCE0F18

FNDX and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 22.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.