Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWD vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to VONG's +1.1%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWD and VONG

Net assets: $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+27.5%
IWD total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWD expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.4 points; IWD is 1.7 times larger.

IWD vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWDVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year+27.5%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Value IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$81.0bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.6%57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returns
IWD VONG
Return
Total return edge VONG +514.2% +1,017.5%
Annualized edge VONG +11.9% +16.2%
Price return edge VONG +333.7% +840.0%
Risk
Volatility edge IWD 16.0% 17.9%
Max drawdown edge VONG (slight) −35.6% −32.5%
Downside capture 100.2% 99.8%
Beta 1.00 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VONG 0.69 0.84
Sortino edge VONG 0.98 1.25
Treynor 0.110 0.151
Calmar edge VONG 0.33 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.23 0.76
Information ratio −0.08 0.11
Tracking error 1.1% 1.0%

Each against its own benchmark: IWD against VONV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VONG returned more: +1,017.5% to +514.2%. IWD swung less: 16.0% to 17.9%. VONG fell slightly less at its worst: −32.5% to −35.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWD vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWDVONGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+514.2%+1,017.5%VONGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.9%+16.2%VONGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+333.7%+840.0%VONGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%17.9%IWDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%12.0%IWD (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.6%−32.5%VONG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.0%99.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.2%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.001.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.690.84VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.981.25VONGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1100.151Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.330.50VONGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVONVIWFThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.230.76Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.5%−0.3% to +0.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.080.11Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.1%1.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VONG hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWD VONG
APPLE 6.08% 7.65%
MICROSOFT 5.21% 5.59%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 0.66% 3.83%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.95% 0.59%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.66% 0.52%
HOME DEPOT 0.22% 0.62%
TJX 0.22% 0.20%
AMGEN INC 0.19% 0.47%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.17% 0.17%
STARBUCKS CORP 0.14% 0.17%
AMERICAN EXPRESS 0.31% 0.14%
BOEING 0.12% 0.27%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWD
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.37%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.71%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.16%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.13%
CHEVRON 1.12%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.98%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Tesla Inc 3.04%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.92%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.71%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 value Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year +27.5% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.7% (VONV) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VONV +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 90.0% 95.5%
Holdings 871 373
Net assets, IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $83.0bn $47.1bn

IWD and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-96A303DFA9

IWD and VONG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWD follows Russell 1000 Value Index and VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWD returned +27.5% and VONG +1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 26.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWD or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWD against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.