Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs IWF: how they differ
IWD and IWF hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and IWF hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE | 5.83% | 7.77% |
| MICROSOFT | 4.93% | 5.55% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 0.69% | 3.52% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 6.04% | 0.62% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 0.61% | 0.53% |
| HOME DEPOT | 0.21% | 0.69% |
| TJX | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| AMGEN INC | 0.16% | 0.44% |
| AMERICAN EXPRESS | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| BOEING | 0.15% | 0.31% |
| MARATHON PETROLEUM | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| STARBUCKS CORP | 0.14% | 0.19% |
| Only in IWD | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.54% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.54% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.85% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.73% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.23% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.14% | TESLA INC 3.22% |
| CHEVRON 1.06% | ELI LILLY 2.72% |
| MERCK & CO INC 0.96% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.49% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 814 | 315 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or IWF?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources