Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs VTV: how they differ
IWF and VTV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWF | Only in VTV |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 15.46% | Micron Technology Inc 4.89% |
| APPLE 7.77% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96% |
| MICROSOFT 5.55% | Johnson & Johnson 2.30% |
| BROADCOM INC 5.10% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% | Walmart Inc 1.87% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% | Caterpillar Inc 1.84% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | AbbVie Inc 1.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | US value |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +22.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | +5.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 98.6% |
| Holdings | 315 | 308 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTV in plain words
VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VTV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VTV?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against VTV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-vtv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources