Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to QQQM's +15.2%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and QQQM

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points.

FNDX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.15%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026$27.6bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
FNDX QQQM
Return
Total return edge FNDX (slight) +169.5% +157.2%
Annualized edge FNDX (slight) +17.9% +17.0%
Price return edge QQQM (slight) +141.2% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX 14.7% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge FNDX −18.9% −35.0%
Downside capture 92.1% 99.8%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNDX 0.97 0.70
Sortino edge FNDX 1.46 1.07
Treynor 0.128 0.147
Calmar edge FNDX 0.95 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 0.62
Information ratio −0.10 0.10
Tracking error 5.3% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNDX returned slightly more: +169.5% to +157.2%. FNDX swung less: 14.7% to 21.0%. FNDX fell less at its worst: −18.9% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+169.5%+157.2%FNDX (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+17.9%+17.0%FNDX (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+141.2%+147.9%QQQM (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.7%21.0%FNDXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%13.6%FNDXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.9%−35.0%FNDXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.901.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.970.70FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.461.07FNDXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.950.49FNDXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.280.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.100.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and QQQM hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX QQQM
Apple Inc 4.46% 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 6.14%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80% 4.25%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 2.93%
Intel Corp 1.42% 2.12%
Alphabet Inc 1.41% 2.72%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21% 2.87%
Micron Technology Inc 0.97% 4.50%
Walmart Inc 0.88% 2.49%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.73% 1.89%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 8.17%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.56% 1.89%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06%
Bank of America Corp 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Only in QQQM
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.18%
Shopify Inc 0.86%
ASML Holding NV 0.66%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.42%
Datadog Inc 0.40%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 95.7%
Holdings 731 105
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $27.6bn $110.4bn

FNDX and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7EC27C5F16

FNDX and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.