FNDB vs SCHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDB and SCHV hold 56% of their weight in the same names, and FNDB returned +23.6% over the year. Net assets on May 31, 2026: $1.3bn for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF and $15.5bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF.
SCHV costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points; SCHV is 11.8 times larger.
| FNDB | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $1.3bn | $15.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.6% | +19.4% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 56% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.8% | 20.3% |
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDB and SCHV hold 56% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
56% in common
On the same fields
FNDB and SCHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FNDB
FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.
About SCHV
SCHV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 555 positions, with the top ten at 20.3%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or SCHV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and SCHV +19.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDB or SCHV?
- SCHV is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDB against SCHV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-schv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDB against SCHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-schv
[FNDB against SCHV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-schv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.