Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDA vs IWC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDA returned +16.4% to IWC's +16.5%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDA and IWC
Net assets: $9.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
FNDA costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.
| Measure | FNDA | IWC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.4% | +16.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Russell Microcap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, FNDA as of Aug 31, 2026 and IWC as of Oct 27, 2026 | $9.1bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDA and IWC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
5% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDA and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDA and IWC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- Cost. FNDA charges 0.25% of assets a year and IWC 0.60%, a gap of 0.35 points.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDA returned +16.4% and IWC +16.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FNDA
FNDA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 913 positions, with the top ten at 3.8%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDA or IWC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDA returned +16.4% and IWC +16.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDA or IWC?
- FNDA is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDA against IWC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-iwc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDA against IWC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-iwc
[FNDA against IWC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fnda-vs-iwc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.