Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNCL vs KBWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNCL returned +7.6% to KBWB's +18.4%; 34% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNCL and KBWB

Net assets: $2.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF, and $6.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco KBW Bank ETF.

At a glance
+7.6%
FNCL total return, 1 year
+18.4%
KBWB total return, 1 year
0.08%
FNCL expense ratio
0.35%
KBWB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNCL costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

FNCL vs KBWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNCLKBWB
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.6%+18.4%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Sep 3, 202610.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 IndexKBW Nasdaq Bank Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Net assets, FNCL as of Sep 30, 2026 and KBWB as of Oct 27, 2026$2.2bn$6.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund48.4%59.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FNCL KBWB
Return
Total return edge FNCL +317.7% +260.5%
Annualized edge FNCL +11.6% +10.4%
Price return edge FNCL +219.9% +164.7%
Risk
Volatility edge FNCL 20.8% 27.2%
Max drawdown edge FNCL −40.6% −48.6%
Downside capture 100.0% 115.0%
Beta 1.00 1.25
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNCL 0.54 0.43
Sortino edge FNCL 0.78 0.62
Treynor 0.112 0.111
Calmar edge FNCL 0.29 0.21
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −2.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.08 −0.61
Information ratio −0.03 0.03
Tracking error 0.6% 18.2%

Each against its own benchmark: FNCL against VFH, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; KBWB against VOO, Nov 11, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNCL returned more: +317.7% to +260.5%. FNCL swung less: 20.8% to 27.2%. FNCL fell less at its worst: −40.6% to −48.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNCL vs KBWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNCLKBWBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+317.7%+260.5%FNCLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.6%+10.4%FNCLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+219.9%+164.7%FNCLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.8%27.2%FNCLSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.4%18.9%FNCLLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.6%−48.6%FNCLDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.1%122.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%115.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.25Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.55Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.43FNCLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.780.62FNCLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1120.111Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.290.21FNCLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVFHVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−2.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.08−0.61Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.3% to +0.4%−11.9% to +6.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.030.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.6%18.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

34%

By the books each fund has filed, FNCL and KBWB hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

34% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNCL KBWB
JPMorgan Chase & Co 10.43% 8.13%
Bank of America Corp 4.65% 7.02%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc 3.32% 7.62%
Wells Fargo & Co 2.93% 8.21%
Morgan Stanley 2.76% 7.51%
Citigroup Inc 2.50% 4.00%
Capital One Financial Corp 1.38% 4.07%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 1.19% 3.94%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 1.11% 4.11%
US Bancorp 1.08% 4.16%
Truist Financial Corp 0.71% 4.20%
State Street Corp 0.57% 3.83%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNCL
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 7.87%
Visa Inc 6.81%
Mastercard Inc 5.19%
American Express Co 1.98%
Charles Schwab Corp 1.92%
Blackrock Inc 1.78%
S&P Global Inc 1.38%
Progressive Corp 1.37%
Only in KBWB
CME E Mini Financial Select Sector Futures 0.15%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.14%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%
CONTRA FUTURE EMINI FINANCIAL SELECT SECTOR DEC -0.15%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +7.6% +18.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.5% (VFH) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs VFH +4.7 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 86.3% 92.5%
Holdings 383 28
Net assets, FNCL as of Sep 30, 2026 and KBWB as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.2bn $6.7bn

FNCL and KBWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6621524A6C

FNCL and KBWB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FNCL follows MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index and KBWB follows KBW Nasdaq Bank Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 34% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNCL returned +7.6% and KBWB +18.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

KBWB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNCL

FNCL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 383 positions, with the top ten at 48.4%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

KBWB

KBWB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 28 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNCL or KBWB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNCL returned +7.6% and KBWB +18.4%.
Which is cheaper, FNCL or KBWB?
FNCL is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNCL and KBWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FNCL and 92% of KBWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNCL against KBWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fncl-vs-kbwb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.