Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNCL vs IYF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNCL returned +7.6% to IYF's +7.8%; 68% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNCL and IYF

Net assets: $2.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF, and $3.7bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares U.S. Financials ETF.

At a glance
+7.6%
FNCL total return, 1 year
+7.8%
IYF total return, 1 year
0.08%
FNCL expense ratio
0.37%
IYF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNCL costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IYF is 1.7 times larger.

FNCL vs IYF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNCLIYF
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.6%+7.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Sep 3, 20265.6%, high on Sep 3, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 IndexRussell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.37%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$2.2bn$3.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common68%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund48.4%48.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FNCL IYF
Return
Total return edge IYF (slight) +317.7% +325.1%
Annualized edge Tie +11.6% +11.8%
Price return edge IYF (slight) +219.9% +242.2%
Risk
Volatility edge IYF (slight) 20.8% 19.7%
Max drawdown edge IYF (slight) −40.6% −39.1%
Downside capture 100.0% 107.0%
Beta 1.00 1.17
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IYF (slight) 0.54 0.56
Sortino edge IYF (slight) 0.78 0.81
Treynor 0.112 0.063
Calmar edge IYF (slight) 0.29 0.30
Against the benchmark
Alpha 0.0% a year −1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.08 −0.70
Information ratio −0.03 −0.03
Tracking error 0.6% 12.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FNCL against VFH, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IYF against IWB, Jun 2, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IYF returned slightly more: +325.1% to +317.7%. IYF swung slightly less: 19.7% to 20.8%. IYF fell slightly less at its worst: −39.1% to −40.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNCL vs IYF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNCLIYFEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+317.7%+325.1%IYF (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.6%+11.8%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+219.9%+242.2%IYF (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.8%19.7%IYF (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.4%13.7%IYF (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.6%−39.1%IYF (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.1%111.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%107.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.17Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.75Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.56IYF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.780.81IYF (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1120.063Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.290.30IYF (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVFHIWBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha0.0% a year−1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.08−0.70Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.3% to +0.4%−6.2% to +2.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.03−0.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.6%12.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

68%

By the books each fund has filed, FNCL and IYF hold 68% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

68% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNCL IYF
JPMorgan Chase & Co 10.43% 11.06%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 7.87% 12.46%
Bank of America Corp 4.65% 3.77%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc 3.32% 3.67%
Wells Fargo & Co 2.93% 3.71%
Morgan Stanley 2.76% 3.30%
Citigroup Inc 2.50% 3.24%
Charles Schwab Corp 1.92% 2.30%
Blackrock Inc 1.78% 2.74%
S&P Global Inc 1.38% 2.09%
Progressive Corp 1.37% 2.08%
Chubb Ltd 1.36% 1.98%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNCL
Visa Inc 6.81%
Mastercard Inc 5.19%
American Express Co 1.98%
Capital One Financial Corp 1.38%
Marsh & McLennan Cos Inc 1.01%
Travelers Cos Inc 0.88%
Moody's Corp 0.80%
KKR & Co Inc 0.70%
Only in IYF
MARSH 1.45%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES 1.30%
MOODYS CORP 1.12%
KKR AND CO INC 0.99%
AMERIPRISE FINANCE INC 0.69%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.68%
INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP INC CLAS 0.57%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC 0.50%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +7.6% +7.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +7.5% (VFH) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs VFH −5.3 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 86.3% 88.8%
Holdings 383 144
Net assets, FNCL as of Sep 30, 2026 and IYF as of Oct 28, 2026 $2.2bn $3.7bn

FNCL and IYF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6A86215EFF

FNCL and IYF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FNCL follows MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index and IYF follows Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.
  2. Cost. FNCL charges 0.08% of assets a year and IYF 0.37%, a gap of 0.29 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 68% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IYF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNCL

FNCL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Financials 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 383 positions, with the top ten at 48.4%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IYF

IYF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 144 positions, with the top ten at 48.3%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNCL or IYF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNCL returned +7.6% and IYF +7.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNCL or IYF?
FNCL is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNCL and IYF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FNCL and 89% of IYF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNCL against IYF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fncl-vs-iyf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.