Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
KBWB vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KBWB returned +18.4% to XLF's +7.6%; 34% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KBWB and XLFNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $6.7bn for Invesco KBW Bank ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLF costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; XLF is 7.7 times larger.
| Measure | KBWB | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.4% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.1%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | KBW Nasdaq Bank Index | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $6.7bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 34% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 57.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 11, 2011 to Oct 23, 2026 · 780 weekly returnsXLF returned more: +585.3% to +505.7%. XLF swung less: 20.3% to 26.5%. XLF fell less at its worst: −39.3% to −48.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | KBWB | XLF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +505.7% | +585.3% | XLF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.8% | +13.7% | XLF (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +328.4% | +322.4% | Tie | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 26.5% | 20.3% | XLF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.1% | 13.8% | XLF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −48.6% | −39.3% | XLF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 0.65 | XLF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.76 | 0.95 | XLF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.26 | 0.35 | XLF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 780 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KBWB and XLF hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
34% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
KBWB and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KBWB and XLF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. KBWB follows KBW Nasdaq Bank Index and XLF follows Financial Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 34% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 KBWB returned +18.4% and XLF +7.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
KBWB
KBWB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 28 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KBWB or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KBWB returned +18.4% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, KBWB or XLF?
- XLF is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KBWB against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kbwb-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). KBWB against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kbwb-vs-xlf
[KBWB against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kbwb-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.