FLTR vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLTR's duration was 0.0 years on Jul 31, 2026 and VUSB's 1.0 on Jun 30, 2026; VUSB charges 0.10% to FLTR's 0.14%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
VUSB costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points.
| FLTR | VUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 | $3.6bn | $9.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +3.4% |
| What it tracks | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
FLTR and VUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and VUSB follows No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLTR returned +4.7% and VUSB +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.3 points.
- Number of holdings (similar). FLTR holds 455 positions and VUSB holds 1344.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FLTR and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About VUSB
VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or VUSB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and VUSB +3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FLTR or VUSB?
- VUSB is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLTR against VUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vusb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLTR against VUSB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vusb
[FLTR against VUSB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vusb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.