FLTR vs VNLA: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 FLTR's duration was 0.0 years and VNLA's 0.8; FLTR charges 0.14% to VNLA's 0.23%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $3.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF.
FLTR costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; VNLA is 1.1 times larger.
| FLTR | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.23% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $3.0bn | $3.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
FLTR and VNLA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and VNLA follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 3% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLTR returned +4.7% and VNLA +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLTR and VNLA hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
3% in common
On the same fields
FLTR and VNLA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About VNLA
VNLA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or VNLA?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and VNLA +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FLTR or VNLA?
- FLTR is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLTR against VNLA, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vnla
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLTR against VNLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vnla
[FLTR against VNLA (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-vnla)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.