Which returned more over the last year, FELG or IWF?

In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELG returned +6.8% and IWF +4.0%.

Which is cheaper, FELG or IWF?

Neither: FELG and IWF both charge 0.18% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do FELG and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 92% of FELG and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

FELG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees

FELG and IWF hold 67% of their weight in the same names, and FELG returned +6.8% over the year. Net assets: $5.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FELG and IWF

Answers cite the figures on this page.

Both cost 0.18% a year; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IWF is far larger, $127.7bn against $5.8bn.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FELG vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
	FELG	IWF
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.18%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026	$5.8bn	$127.7bn
Total return, 1 year	+6.8%	+4.0%
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	Russell 1000 Growth Index
Holdings in common	67%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	54.6%	57.8%
Below its high	5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

+6.8%

FELG total return, 1 year

+4.0%

IWF total return, 1 year

0.18%

FELG expense ratio

0.18%

IWF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FELG and IWF hold 67% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.

50%

half

67% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FELG IWF

NVIDIA CORP 13.13% 15.20%

APPLE INC 7.57% 8.06%

ALPHABET INC 6.60% 6.02%

MICROSOFT CORP 5.02% 5.95%

BROADCOM INC 5.43% 4.67%

ALPHABET INC 3.35% 4.86%

META PLATFORMS INC 3.24% 3.81%

TESLA INC 3.51% 3.23%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.23% 3.06%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 2.48% 2.63%

MASTERCARD INC 1.78% 1.49%

VISA INC 1.23% 2.05%

Only in FELG

ELI LILLY and CO 2.52%

AMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW 1.26%

SANDISK CORP 1.00%

APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.64%

TJX COMPANIES INC 0.61%

INCYTE CORP 0.57%

SCHWAB CHARLES CORP 0.57%

VERALTO CORP 0.54%

Only in IWF

ELI LILLY 2.97%

APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.98%

TEXAS INSTRUMENT 0.75%

SANDISK 0.60%

AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.59%

AMGEN INC 0.49%

BOOKING HOLDINGS 0.38%

MCKESSON CORP 0.33%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FELG

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Fidelity iShares

What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 growth

Total return, 1 year +6.8% +4.0%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +4.1% (VONG)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.2 pts vs VONG

Expense ratio 0.18% 0.18%

Already in the S&P 500 91.5% 93.5%

Holdings 142 373

Net assets, FELG as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWF as of Oct 20, 2026 $5.8bn $125.0bn

FELG and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FELG

FELG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 142 positions, with the top ten at 54.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.

About IWF

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FELG or IWF?: In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELG returned +6.8% and IWF +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, FELG or IWF?: Neither: FELG and IWF both charge 0.18% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FELG and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 92% of FELG and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

FELG vs ONEQ FELG vs JGRO FELG vs MAGS FELG vs GARP IWF vs JTEK GARP vs IWF IWF vs NULG IWF vs QGRW

FELG on its own →IWF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FELG dividend history →FELG holdings →IWF dividend history →IWF holdings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FELG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FELG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗IWF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FELG against IWF, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felg-vs-iwf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.