Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDVV and VT finished level, +13.5% against +13.5%, and they share 21% of their weight.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FDVV and VT
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $10.2bn for Fidelity High Dividend ETF and $81.8bn for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.09 points a year less; both returned +13.5% over a year; VT is 8.0 times larger.
| Measure | FDVV | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.2bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 526 weekly returnsFDVV returned more: +247.7% to +215.7%. VT swung slightly less: 16.4% to 16.9%. VT fell less at its worst: −32.6% to −37.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FDVV | VT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +247.7% | +215.7% | FDVV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.1% | +12.0% | FDVV (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +143.5% | +156.3% | VT (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.9% | 16.4% | VT (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.1% | 11.5% | VT (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −37.4% | −32.6% | VT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.67 | 0.62 | FDVV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.93 | 0.89 | FDVV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.35 | 0.37 | VT (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 526 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and VT hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FDVV and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FDVV follows Fidelity High Dividend Index and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 21% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- Number of holdings. FDVV holds 95 positions and VT holds 10194.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +13.5% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FDVV against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vt
[FDVV against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.