Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs URTH: how they differ
FDVV and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| MITSUI OSK LINES LTD | 0.22% | 0.02% |
| SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD | 0.18% | 0.01% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | NVIDIA 5.52% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | APPLE 5.28% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | MICROSOFT 3.82% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.67% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | BROADCOM INC 1.79% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | High Dividend | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 96 | 1230 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or URTH?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources