Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs FDVV: how they differ
ACWX and FDVV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| MITSUI OSK LINES LTD | 0.04% | 0.22% |
| SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD | 0.02% | 0.18% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in FDVV |
|---|---|
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.09% | NVIDIA CORP 6.86% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.50% | APPLE INC 5.70% |
| SK HYNIX 2.04% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% |
| ASML HOLDING 1.77% | BROADCOM INC 3.50% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.94% | JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.88% | ALPHABET INC 2.21% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.79% | COCA COLA CO 1.85% |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.76% | PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.7% |
| Holdings | 1515 | 96 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1515 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%.
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or FDVV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or FDVV?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against FDVV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-fdvv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources