Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PVAL vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PVAL returned +26.6% to VT's +13.5%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PVAL and VT
Net assets: $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
VT costs 0.49 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.1 points.
| Measure | PVAL | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +26.6% | +13.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $14.1bn | $81.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.8% | 22.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PVAL and VT hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
16% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PVAL and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PVAL and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. PVAL follows No index, actively managed and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
- Holdings in common. 16% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 PVAL returned +26.6% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.
VT
VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or VT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +26.6% and VT +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, PVAL or VT?
- VT is cheaper, by 0.49 percentage points a year. That is about $49 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PVAL against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-vt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PVAL against VT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-vt
[PVAL against VT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pval-vs-vt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.