Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or TLT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and TLT returned −6.4%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or TLT?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs TLT: how they differ

FDVV and TLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in TLT
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%
APPLE INC 5.70%	TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	TREASURY BOND 0.02%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FDVV and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	High Dividend	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	96	41

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or TLT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and TLT returned −6.4%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or TLT?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against TLT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-tlt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources