Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs VLUE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to VLUE's +54.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and VLUE

Net assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $9.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+54.7%
VLUE total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.15%
VLUE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 62.6 points; TLT is 5.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

TLT vs VLUE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTVLUE
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+54.7%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexMSCI USA Enhanced Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$47.4bn$9.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight97%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and VLUE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT VLUE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in VLUE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 20.94%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.37%
GENERAL MOTORS 3.54%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 2.72%
AT&T 2.24%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 1.95%
PFIZER 1.86%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.77%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks the MSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +54.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB +41.1 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 47 148
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VLUE as of Oct 28, 2026 $47.4bn $9.4bn

TLT and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT and VLUE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

VLUE

VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +54.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VLUE?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and VLUE +54.7%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or VLUE?
Neither: TLT and VLUE both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against VLUE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-vlue

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.