Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to VYM's +18.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and VYM

Net assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $78.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+18.0%
VYM total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.04%
VYM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VYM costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.9 points; VYM is 1.7 times larger.

TLT vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTVYM
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+18.0%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexFTSE High Dividend Yield Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.2bn$78.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight90%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT VYM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in VYM
Broadcom Inc 6.93%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.75%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.84%
Johnson & Johnson 2.71%
AbbVie Inc 1.96%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.80%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Caterpillar Inc 1.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks an index of US high dividend
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +18.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Holdings 47 595
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VYM as of Sep 30, 2026 $47.4bn $78.9bn

TLT and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

VYM

VYM tracks an index of US high dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 595 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VYM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and VYM +18.0%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or VYM?
VYM is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against VYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-vym

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.