Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FCOM vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FCOM returned −5.9% to XLC's −10.4%; 71% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FCOM and XLC
Net assets: $1.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF, and $22.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.08% a year; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points; XLC is 12.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FCOM | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −5.9% | −10.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.0%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | 13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index | Communication Services Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.8bn | $22.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 71% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 71.0% | 75.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 29, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 434 weekly returnsFCOM returned more: +160.6% to +131.1%. XLC swung slightly less: 20.0% to 20.7%. FCOM and XLC fell about the same at their worst: −46.4% and −45.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FCOM | XLC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +160.6% | +131.1% | FCOM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.2% | +10.6% | FCOM | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +140.0% | +113.0% | FCOM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.7% | 20.0% | XLC (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.4% | 14.0% | XLC (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −46.4% | −45.9% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 0.46 | FCOM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.75 | 0.66 | FCOM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.26 | 0.23 | FCOM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 434 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FCOM and XLC hold 71% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
71% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FCOM and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FCOM and XLC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FCOM follows MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index and XLC follows Communication Services Select Sector Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FCOM returned −5.9% and XLC −10.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.5 points.
- Number of holdings. FCOM holds 88 positions and XLC holds 23.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FCOM
FCOM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested, against −5.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 71.0%. It sat 11.0% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLC
XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FCOM against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fcom-vs-xlc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FCOM against XLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fcom-vs-xlc
[FCOM against XLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fcom-vs-xlc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.