Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SHY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SHY's +1.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SHY

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $27.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+1.6%
SHY total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.15%
SHY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHY costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; SHY is 3.5 times larger.

FBCG vs SHY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSHY
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+1.6%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$7.6bn$26.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SHY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in SHY
TREASURY NOTE 2.11%
TREASURY NOTE 1.99%
TREASURY NOTE 1.83%
TREASURY NOTE 1.73%
TREASURY NOTE 1.62%
TREASURY NOTE 1.54%
TREASURY NOTE 1.51%
TREASURY NOTE 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of 1-3 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +1.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +1.7% (BBSB)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs BBSB
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.15%
Holdings 230 90
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SHY as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.6bn $27.4bn

FBCG and SHY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

SHY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHY

SHY tracks an index of 1-3 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +1.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SHY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SHY +1.6%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SHY?
SHY is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SHY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-shy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.