Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SCHP's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SCHP

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $16.5bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
−0.8%
SCHP total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.03%
SCHP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHP costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points.

FBCG vs SCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSCHP
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedUS TIPS
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.03%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026$7.6bn$16.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SCHP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
NVIDIA CORP 14.90%
APPLE INC 9.31%
ALPHABET INC 9.27%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94%
BROADCOM INC 4.38%
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31%
Only in SCHP
United States Treasury 4.07%
United States Treasury 4.01%
United States Treasury 4.00%
United States Treasury 3.77%
United States Treasury 3.60%
United States Treasury 3.40%
United States Treasury 3.38%
United States Treasury 3.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US TIPS
Total return, 1 year +9.5% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO +0.6 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.03%
Holdings 230 48
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHP as of Jun 30, 2026 $7.6bn $16.5bn

FBCG and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHP

SCHP tracks an index of US TIPS. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SCHP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SCHP −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SCHP?
SCHP is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SCHP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-schp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.