Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FBCG vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FBCG returned +9.5% to SCHX's +13.1%; 48% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBCG and SCHX

Net assets: $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+9.5%
FBCG total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.57%
FBCG expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points.

FBCG vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.5%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.57%0.03%
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$7.6bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returns
FBCG SCHX
Return
Total return edge FBCG +197.7% +169.5%
Annualized edge FBCG (slight) +18.6% +16.8%
Price return edge FBCG +197.2% +145.9%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHX 23.9% 16.2%
Max drawdown edge SCHX −42.6% −24.8%
Downside capture 126.3% 100.5%
Beta 1.39 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHX 0.71 0.85
Sortino edge SCHX 1.09 1.31
Treynor 0.121 0.129
Calmar edge SCHX 0.44 0.68
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.6% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 −0.62
Information ratio 0.26 −0.05
Tracking error 11.2% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: FBCG against VOO, Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FBCG returned more: +197.7% to +169.5%. SCHX swung less: 16.2% to 23.9%. SCHX fell less at its worst: −24.8% to −42.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FBCG vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFBCGSCHXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+197.7%+169.5%FBCGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.6%+16.8%FBCG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+197.2%+145.9%FBCGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.9%16.2%SCHXSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%10.5%SCHXLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−42.6%−24.8%SCHXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture168.9%100.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture126.3%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.391.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.85SCHXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.31SCHXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.129Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.440.68SCHXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.6% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.70−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.9% to +4.7%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.26−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.2%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

48%

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and SCHX hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

48% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBCG SCHX
NVIDIA CORP 14.90% 7.69%
APPLE INC 9.31% 6.69%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.94% 5.42%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.86% 3.66%
ALPHABET INC 9.27% 2.86%
BROADCOM INC 4.38% 2.52%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.31% 1.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.97% 1.56%
TESLA INC 1.28% 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.06% 1.10%
MASTERCARD INC 0.85% 0.68%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 0.68% 0.51%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FBCG
ELI LILLY and CO 2.71%
SANDISK CORP 1.28%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.17%
CELESTICA INC 0.66%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 0.47%
GE AEROSPACE 0.45%
UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC 0.43%
LOWES COS INC 0.37%
Only in SCHX
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.37%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.33%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.32%
Johnson & Johnson 0.92%
Walmart Inc 0.66%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.63%
Chevron Corp 0.56%
Merck & Co Inc 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +9.5% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −4.2 pts vs VOO −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.57% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 85.3% 93.6%
Holdings 230 747
Net assets, FBCG as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $7.6bn $74.2bn

FBCG and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7C913D8032

FBCG and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FBCG follows No index, actively managed and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 48% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FBCG returned +9.5% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FBCG

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +9.5% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of FBCG and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBCG against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.