Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FBCG vs IVV: how they differ
FBCG and IVV hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and IVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FBCG | Only in IVV |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.62% | NVIDIA 8.06% |
| APPLE INC 9.64% | APPLE 7.31% |
| ALPHABET INC 9.10% | MICROSOFT 5.58% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.76% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.98% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% | BROADCOM INC 2.61% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.74% | ALPHABET CLASS C 2.38% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Blue Chip Growth | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.3% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.2 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 214 | 505 |
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IVV in plain words
IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or IVV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and IVV returned +17.6%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FBCG or IVV?
- FBCG charges 0.57% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FBCG and IVV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 100% of IVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against IVV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbcg-vs-ivv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources