Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EZU vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EZU returned +7.1% to VGIT's −1.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EZU and VGIT

Net assets: $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF, and $39.7bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
−1.5%
VGIT total return, 1 year
0.50%
EZU expense ratio
0.03%
VGIT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGIT costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; VGIT is 4.2 times larger.

EZU vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUVGIT
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.1%−1.5%
Drawdown
Below its high8.7%, high on Aug 14, 20263.5%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EMU IndexBloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$9.4bn$39.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returns
EZU VGIT
Return
Total return edge EZU +165.2% +41.4%
Annualized edge EZU +5.9% +2.1%
Price return edge EZU +66.6% −4.2%
Risk
Volatility edge VGIT 21.5% 4.2%
Max drawdown edge VGIT −40.3% −15.6%
Downside capture 107.7% 98.6%
Beta 1.12 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EZU 0.31 0.15
Sortino edge EZU 0.43 0.21
Treynor 0.046 0.002
Calmar edge EZU (slight) 0.15 0.13
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.5% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.24 −0.10
Information ratio 0.02 −0.03
Tracking error 8.6% 0.5%

Each against its own benchmark: EZU against ACWX, Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026; VGIT against SCHR, Aug 13, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EZU returned more: +165.2% to +41.4%. VGIT swung less: 4.2% to 21.5%. VGIT fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −40.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EZU vs VGIT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEZUVGITEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+165.2%+41.4%EZUPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+5.9%+2.1%EZUTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+66.6%−4.2%EZUPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.5%4.2%VGITSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.4%2.9%VGITLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.3%−15.6%VGITDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture119.8%98.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture107.7%98.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.120.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.880.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.15EZUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.430.21EZUReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0460.002Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.13EZU (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXSCHRThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.5% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.24−0.10Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.2% to +3.3%−0.2% to +0.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.02−0.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error8.6%0.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EZU VGIT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Only in VGIT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.85%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Eurozone Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +7.1% −1.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) −1.5% (SCHR)
Gap to its benchmark −7.2 pts vs ACWX 0.0 pts vs SCHR
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.03%
Holdings 216 103
Net assets, EZU as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGIT as of Sep 30, 2026 $9.2bn $39.7bn

EZU and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-41BE5086AC

EZU and VGIT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. EZU follows MSCI EMU Index and VGIT follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EZU returned +7.1% and VGIT −1.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EZU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGIT

VGIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.5% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or VGIT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +7.1% and VGIT −1.5%.
Which is cheaper, EZU or VGIT?
VGIT is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EZU against VGIT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ezu-vs-vgit

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.