Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWT vs SPSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to SPSB's +2.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWT and SPSB
Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $11.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
SPSB costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 67.7 points.
| Measure | EWT | SPSB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +69.9% | +2.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.8bn | $11.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 24, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 878 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: EWT against EEM, Apr 25, 2003 to Oct 23, 2026; SPSB against AGG, Dec 24, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
EWT returned more: +690.5% to +47.3%. SPSB swung less: 3.0% to 20.6%. SPSB fell less at its worst: −9.9% to −38.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWT | SPSB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +690.5% | +47.3% | EWT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.0% | +2.3% | EWT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +315.3% | −1.4% | EWT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.6% | 3.0% | SPSB | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.2% | 2.1% | SPSB | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −38.2% | −9.9% | SPSB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 78.9% | 30.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 88.6% | 20.4% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.82 | 0.39 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.67 | 0.36 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.62 | 0.27 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.91 | 0.39 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.155 | 0.020 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.34 | 0.23 | EWT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | EEM | AGG | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +4.5% a year | +0.4% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.63 | 0.78 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.9% to +9.8% | −0.7% to +1.6% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.19 | −0.03 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 13.9% | 3.6% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 878 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and SPSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWT and SPSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT and SPSB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and SPSB follows Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Corporate Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and SPSB +2.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 67.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SPSB
SPSB tracks an index of Short Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.2% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or SPSB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and SPSB +2.2%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or SPSB?
- SPSB is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against SPSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-spsb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWT against SPSB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-spsb
[EWT against SPSB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-spsb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.