Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to EWT's +69.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and EWT
Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 68.9 points; BSV is 3.7 times larger.
| Measure | BSV | EWT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +69.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $45.4bn | $12.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or EWT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and EWT +69.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or EWT?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-ewt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against EWT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-ewt
[BSV against EWT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-ewt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.