Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BSV vs FLKR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BSV returned +1.0% to FLKR's +79.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BSV and FLKR
Net assets: $45.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
Pair scorecard
BSV costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 78.7 points.
| Measure | BSV | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.0% | +79.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, BSV as of Sep 30, 2026 and FLKR as of Oct 28, 2026 | $45.4bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BSV and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BSV and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BSV
BSV tracks an index of Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSV or FLKR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.0% and FLKR +79.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BSV or FLKR?
- BSV is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSV against FLKR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-flkr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BSV against FLKR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-flkr
[BSV against FLKR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bsv-vs-flkr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.