Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWT vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to JNK's +1.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWT and JNK

Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $5.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

At a glance
+69.9%
EWT total return, 1 year
+1.7%
JNK total return, 1 year
0.59%
EWT expense ratio
0.40%
JNK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

JNK costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 68.2 points; EWT is 2.0 times larger.

EWT vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWTJNK
Return
Total return, 1 year+69.9%+1.7%
Drawdown
Below its high7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Taiwan 25/50 IndexBloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.8bn$5.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWT JNK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%
MEDIATEK 6.03%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%
ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%
Only in JNK
1261229 BC LTD SR SECURED 144A 04/32 10 0.65%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC SR SECURED 144A 04/31 6.25 0.53%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC SR SECURED 144A 03/32 6.375 0.46%
ECHOSTAR CORP SR SECURED 11/29 10.75 0.45%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/32 9.25 0.44%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/34 9.75 0.43%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 SR SECURED 144A 05/31 6.5 0.42%
VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC SR SECURED 144A 02/29 9.5 0.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Taiwan Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year +69.9% +1.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.3% (EEM) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +53.6 pts vs EEM +3.1 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.40%
Holdings 79 1142
Net assets, EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 and JNK as of Oct 27, 2026 $12.0bn $5.9bn

EWT and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWT and JNK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or JNK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and JNK +1.7%.
Which is cheaper, EWT or JNK?
JNK is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWT against JNK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-jnk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.